sanguinemare

March 24, 2017

Just sent in my revision for my first paper! (And why that is a big deal)

Filed under: "Me" updates,Grad school,Research — sanguinemare @ 4:12 pm

HELLO all you lovely people (aka the 1 person who may actually see that I have finally posted after months of hiatus)!  I’m so sorry for dropping off the face of the planet, but well, PhD life is somewhat of a struggle and between that and battling long bouts of depression, it’s been difficult to drag myself up to write something substantial like this.  (I have also come to realize that I think almost all graduate students go through a mini existential crisis/period of depression before it’s over, unless they are extremely lucky and really love their work, mentor, and are extremely fortunate in their ability to generate and analyze data, but that is a story for a different day… if I ever get around to it, haha).

… and now that I actually revisited my last post, I realize I have somewhat reiterated myself, so I guess not much has changed over the last… 7 months?  Haha whoops.  Oh well.  Also apologies in advance for the somewhat incoherence of thought on this post as my brain is currently rather fried.

Anyway!

So I literally just clicked “submit” on my revision for my first paper.  This is a big deal for multiple reasons:

  1. It’s a graduation requirement. Of course, this is my first priority right now, so it gets to be first on this list 😛  As a graduate student, at least in the biomedical sciences, we are usually required to have at least one paper published under our name before we are allowed to graduate.  This is because, as I’ve mentioned in my last post, publications are essentially the “currency” of academia, and programs want to help their students show that they are competent and competitive in the scientific world, which will help with their upcoming job search.  The slightly less altruistic reason is that it also reflects well on the department/program/school/institution if they can show that a significant portion of their graduate student population are publishing good papers in peer-reviewed journals (important statistics for funding purposes).

    The publication requirements will vary based on said department/program, school (i.e. school of health professions vs. school of bioengineering) and institution, but my particular one requires at least 2 papers published before graduation, with at least one being a first author paper (*note: review papers – which are essentially summaries of a particular topic based on research that has already been published – do not count towards this second stipulation).  The paper that I have just turned in is my first, first-author paper, and thus is super important to get accepted since I am trying to graduate in May/June, and it has so far seemed to take an average of 2 months for responses from journals, which means timing is really tight right now. Speaking of which…

  2. Revision = higher chance of acceptance (?). Considering this is my first experience with submitting a manuscript, I’m not entirely sure how accurate this statement is, but from what I gather, a revision decision is usually a positive sign for a manuscript to get accepted into a journal for publication, especially if the revisions are minor.

    To give a little walk-through of this whole process thus far, I first started the analysis for writing up this paper a little over a year ago, ~Feb 2016.  The first complete draft was written by June, and after many (many) revisions, we finally submitted this article to a journal in August.  We waited for a long two months, during which one of my co-authors casually mentioned that perhaps it was actually a good sign we hadn’t heard in so long because she had also submitted to the same journal a couple weeks later and had already gotten a rejection letter.  She was right in a way, because in October, we got our paper back with reviewer notes, which is better than an outright rejection since it means that the editors thought it was at least interesting enough to send out to reviewers.  However, the journal ultimately rejected it after the review, though they did give us an option to do an internal transfer to another of the journals in their group.  We took that option and I did revisions based off of the reviewers’ comments.  We then resubmitted it to the new journal this January (there was a brief hiatus on this work as I was out of the town/the country for a little over a month between Nov-Dec).  After waiting another 2 harrowing months, we finally got the decision letter last week, which basically said they thought it was interesting, but reviewers had concerns which made it unacceptable at the present moment. Hopefully that means it will be acceptable after the changes…?  So I made the changes, and sent it in today. (Though a slightly concerning note at the bottom of the letter said that any decision after the revision was final, which induced a minor paranoia as I went to click the submit button earlier today. Heh).  Here’s to hoping it gets accepted!  Which brings us to the last point…

  3. (If accepted =) it’s a milestone as a scientist/researcher.  I kind of alluded to this above, but basically, having a first-author paper in a peer-reviewed journal helps to establish your worth to the scientific community.  The first author is the one who has generally been involved in all the aspects of the study, including conception/design of the study, conduction of the experiments, analysis, reading of the background literature, and writing the manuscript. Thus, in a way, a first first-author paper establishes the level of work others can expect from the author in the future, and is thus like a debut of sorts into the scientific world.

So yeah. In a nutshell, that’s why I’m actually quite happy with myself/life for once, and will likely take this weekend to celebrate (some of us in MSTP are going to Six Flags for a day!) before the massive freak-out session starting next week about how I only

Thanks for reading and see you on the other side (after my defense)!

Advertisements

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: